Reply To: Unexpected results in uSimmics vs Qucs-S

Home › Forums › Usage › Unexpected results in uSimmics vs Qucs-S › Reply To: Unexpected results in uSimmics vs Qucs-S

16. April 2025 at 19:36 #8967
Hub
Participant

    Hi!

    Thank you so much for the help. The metallization thickness setting helps fix this.

    Though, does this mean that there is a possible default thickness being identified in both ADS and QUCS-S but not in uSimmics? If you see the other screenshots, seems like setting t=0 in the others doesn’t cause the same issue.

    Thanks!