Hub

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • 16. April 2025 at 19:36 in reply to: Unexpected results in uSimmics vs Qucs-S #8967
    Hub
    Participant

      Hi!

      Thank you so much for the help. The metallization thickness setting helps fix this.

      Though, does this mean that there is a possible default thickness being identified in both ADS and QUCS-S but not in uSimmics? If you see the other screenshots, seems like setting t=0 in the others doesn’t cause the same issue.

      Thanks!

      16. April 2025 at 6:54 in reply to: Unexpected results in uSimmics vs Qucs-S #8963
      Hub
      Participant

        16. April 2025 at 6:50 in reply to: Unexpected results in uSimmics vs Qucs-S #8962
        Hub
        Participant

          Adding in the Qucs-S file since that seems to have exceeded the file size limit.

        • Author
          Posts
        Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)