Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
function rtoz() is no longer defined. Is that a bug or intentional?
I remember using it once.
ztor() still exists
Thank you very much for making this possible!
Changelog would be nice.
Just saw, Qucs is not using another pcb layout tool.
Hi Enki,
What exactly don’t you like about QucsStudio’s results?
Hey Michael,
I’m curious. When can we expect the next release?
Cheers
Carsten
23. September 2024 at 21:28 in reply to: QUSC Studio crash when trying to open a project that outside of ~/.qucs #8648one Ubuntu / Wine it works for me. Happy to find a functionality that works better under linux 🙂
23. September 2024 at 21:25 in reply to: Cannot find a .qucs project file with “Create Project” #8647Do you mean “create package”?
If you select that, you are asked to give a directory/filename for the package / .qucs file.
22. September 2024 at 13:32 in reply to: QUSC Studio crash when trying to open a project that outside of ~/.qucs #8645yes, confirmed. (on Windows 11).
I didn’t know that such a menu option exists.
20. September 2024 at 10:47 in reply to: Trouble with goal equations over a specified range of frequencies #8643Happy to hear that.
You mean there is a QucsStudio example that is not working?
>Perhaps the documentation could be clear about this very common requirement?
What improvement do you suggest?
The F1 help page “Mathematical Functions” gives the definitions
max(x) – maximum of all values in xs
range(f,x1,x2) – y values of f whose x values lie between x1 and x2It should be clear, that max() has only one parameter.
19. September 2024 at 10:51 in reply to: Trouble with goal equations over a specified range of frequencies #8641Seems that max() does not support a range selection.
max(range(dB(S[2,1]),45e6,60e6))
seems to work.
Wo gibt es diese “3.3.2-light” ?
works for me.

3. May 2024 at 11:18 in reply to: Incorrect sourceimpedance when using S1P block with measured impeedance. #8378>Mind, that you acquired a s1p file, but are using a 2-port-symbol.
>It would not surprise me, that this gives random results. You can edit the number of ports in that block’s properties.I saw the other forum post. That is seemingly needed, if you have complex port impedances.
Still, I don’t see how this is needed in your case.PS: I could not edit my last post. Seemingly the edit button is sometimes shown and sometimes not.
3. May 2024 at 10:59 in reply to: Incorrect sourceimpedance when using S1P block with measured impeedance. #8377Hi Andy,
I don’t understand this sentence:
>But when connecting the S1P block to standard 50 Ohm (real-impedance only) simulation port, with the “Ref” pin to GND, >or the return bus for the floating receiver circuit.
I expected a structure like “But when …, then…”.
Also, what do you mean with “floating receiver circuit”?
Maybe you want to correct your forum post?
Mind, that you acquired a s1p file, but are using a 2-port-symbol. It would not surprise me, that this gives random results. You can edit the number of ports in that block’s properties.
Best
Carsten
Hi Linky,
I was wondering..
In the second Equation “lin_pwr = RF_pwr+m1”
Is ‘m1’ referring to the marker ‘m1’?
Best
Carsten
I could reproduce it.
-
AuthorPosts