Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 129 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PCB layouter does not open #9250
    QucsStudio
    Keymaster

      Thanks a lot for the report! I’ve just renewed the ZIP archive for uSimmics 5.9. It now includes the missing QtOpenGL4.dll file. So, everything should be fine again.

      QucsStudio
      Keymaster

        Shorted components are ideal short-circuits! What you observed is indeed a bug that appears sometimes if several shorted components are connected in series. Thanks a lot for reporting it! It will be fixed in the next release.

        QucsStudio
        Keymaster

          Indeed, I’m currently thinking about the date for a new release. But I don’t know if it will come this year.

          QucsStudio
          Keymaster

            Yes, you are right! That’s not as it should be. Thanks a lot for reporting it. It will be fixed in the coming release.

            It came from the lowpass filter design, but for bandpass filters it’s indeed unnecessary.

            in reply to: License Inquiry for Commercial Use of QucsStudio #9032
            QucsStudio
            Keymaster

              Hello,

              the uSimmics/QucsStudio license complies indeed as you wrote, i.e. you are allowed to use the program freely within your company, but any commercial redistribution, modification or implementation into other non-free products are forbidden. I have updated the legal site to clarify this.

              If you have further questions or remarks of any kind, please let me know. And if you like the program, please consider to make a donation.

              QucsStudio
              Keymaster

                Thanks for the donation! It definitely helps to keep the project alive.

                QucsStudio
                Keymaster

                  Hello,

                  many thanks for the bug report! I can reproduce it. I happens because inside the subcircuit (BAR64), the port nodes are labeled. Thus, the best work-around is to delete these labels. I will fix it in the next release.

                  in reply to: Migrating complex multicoupler from MWO #8924
                  QucsStudio
                  Keymaster

                    Thanks for the praise! I’m glad that you like it.

                    The unit “mil” can be used after numbers like all other units, too. So, “10 mil” works, but “var1 mil” does not. Usually, I recommend to define a variable with unit, e.g. “var1=10 mil”, and not separate the number from the unit.

                    Indeed, there are no global variables in uSimmics. The usual way is to define subcircuit parameters instead. Please read the section “Working with Subcircuits” in the program help (F1 key) to see how this is done.

                    Concerning optimizations, yes, it is performed if (and only if) an optimization component is placed into the schematic. This can be disabled if it should not be used anymore. (right-click on it and choose “Deactivate/Activate”)

                    Good luck!

                    in reply to: Feedback and Comments #8904
                    QucsStudio
                    Keymaster

                      Hello Larry,

                      >>1st paragraph, sentence after “(7)”. “You will be ask…”. “ask” should be “asked”.
                      You’re right, thanks for reporting it! I will fix it.

                      >>2nd paragraph, 3rd line, “Pressing the right mouse button … doesn’t work for me
                      That’s strange. I tested it on several machines from WinXP to Win12 without problems. If your right-mouse button works in other applications, I won’t have an explanation for this behavior.

                      >>The ground symbol you have is for an “earth ground”…. (Reference IEC 60617 or IEEE 315, clause 3.9.1)
                      This reference also states that the “earth ground” symbol is used for “general ground”, too, so I think it’s correct here.

                      >>Units of measure are considered common nouns and are not capitalized. “50 Ohm”….
                      You’re right again. I will use the capital omega instead.

                      QucsStudio
                      Keymaster

                        Yes, I can confirm this bug and will fix it. Thanks a lot for reporting it!

                        in reply to: Tool for merging s2p-files into sNp-files #8883
                        QucsStudio
                        Keymaster

                          Hm, maybe a nice feature. I will think about it. Currently, I don’t know how the user could enter all necessary infos in a adequate way. But let’s see…

                          in reply to: EM-simulation result to sNp-file ? #8882
                          QucsStudio
                          Keymaster

                            Currently, the EM simulation calculates the first row of s-parameter matrix only, because each row would mean a new, time-consuming simulation (due to FDTD). Therefore, a conversion into sNp file is not possible. Sorry for this!

                            QucsStudio
                            Keymaster

                              You are right, thanks a lot for reporting this bug! It will be fixed in the next release.

                              in reply to: Version 5.8 released #8859
                              QucsStudio
                              Keymaster

                                Yes, this is intentional. stoz() does the same job, so please use this function. ztor() is still needed and thus, does still exist.

                                in reply to: v5.8 trying to evaluate deactivated formula #8858
                                QucsStudio
                                Keymaster

                                  Thanks a lot for the hint! I wasn’t aware of this. Of course, I will fix it.

                                Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 129 total)