Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 98 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Junk Messages #7688
    QucsStudio
    Keymaster

    Great! Thanks a lot indeed!

    in reply to: The forum is full of spam #7506
    QucsStudio
    Keymaster

    Thanks for offering help! This keeps the project alive. I will contact you for details.

    Concerning the future of QucsStudio, I will do my best to keep it running. But as you can see on this forum (for example), interest and support is quite low. And so is the progress, too. But maybe I will find a sponsor that boosts the development. Let’s see…

    QucsStudio
    Keymaster

    Even though your thoughts make sense, I don’t think that the current behavior is inconsistent. Proposal A is not bad, but I still find the current solution the best one.

    in reply to: Need help with s-par simulation #7503
    QucsStudio
    Keymaster

    Problem nr 1 is indeed a bug. Thanks a lot for reporting it!

    Concerning problem nr 3: GaCircle(200) means plot the circle for power gain = 200. The number in the bottom left corner of a smith chart appears if the data is outside the unity circle and gives the outer radius of the chart.

    QucsStudio
    Keymaster

    Yes, the range() function makes the trouble, because it creates a new dependency.

    But it works, if you write “average(range(Isw.it, 4.5ms, 5ms))” directly into the diagram.

    It also works with “Export=no” in an equation component. But then, the equation must be in the same document like the diagram. I.e. if you use a different document for the diagrams than for the schematic, place the equation together with the diagrams. “Export=no” is not necessary then.

    in reply to: Python API #7416
    QucsStudio
    Keymaster

    This is an interesting feature indeed! Which functionality would you propose, i.e. an example? Do you know how a Python API works, i.e. do you have a simple example code (C++ code for the application and for the Python side)?

    Many thanks!

    in reply to: Modeling Constant Phase Element (CPE) #7408
    QucsStudio
    Keymaster

    You can use the frequency domain component and enter the wanted equation. (see attached picture)

    Attachments:
    QucsStudio
    Keymaster

    Yes, this is a bug. Up to now, the simulation engine can’t handle the different dependency. But the GUI can. So, you can either write the equation directly into the diagram, or chose “Export=no” in the equation block and then simulate again.

    QucsStudio
    Keymaster

    That’s great and just in time, as I’m currently thinking about how to keep the project alive.
    I will contact you directly. Many thanks!

    in reply to: The forum is full of spam #7405
    QucsStudio
    Keymaster

    The software is not abandoned, but there’s nobody who maintains the forum.

    Everyone willing to help here is very welcome! Thanks a lot!

    in reply to: avoid link to old kicad domain #7193
    QucsStudio
    Keymaster

    I just changed it. Thanks for the hint!

    in reply to: equation block auto-renaming variable #7143
    QucsStudio
    Keymaster

    Yes, you are right, I can confirm it now.
    Many thanks for the report!

    in reply to: equation block auto-renaming variable #7132
    QucsStudio
    Keymaster

    I cannot reproduce it!? When exactly does it happen?

    > add equation block and add a variable a = 1. Apply. Ok.
    “Ok” is enough, “Apply” is not needed.

    > Now you should have y=1 and a=1.
    Should have or do you have it?

    > open it again, delete a. Apply. ok.
    Again “Apply” is not necessary.

    > open it again. Add. enter name ‘b’. enter value ‘2’. Apply.
    So you change ‘y’ to ‘b’ and ‘1’ to ‘2’ and then press “Apply” and not “ok”?

    > name is now automatically change to ‘a’ , which it should not.
    You mean you are still in the dialog and the ‘b’ in the line-edit field is changed to ‘a’?

    Thanks!

    QucsStudio
    Keymaster

    Yes, you’re right! Many thanks for the bug report. I will fix it.

    in reply to: jumps in S11 with phase shifter=0 #7024
    QucsStudio
    Keymaster

    Uops, yes, it’s because of a pole in the y-parameters of the phaseshifter. I will change this.

    By the way, thank you very much for all your bug reports and hints! They are very important to evolve QucsStudio.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 98 total)